Greenpeace Hit with Major Damages Over Dakota Access Pipeline Protests
In a landmark ruling, a North Dakota court has ordered Greenpeace to pay several hundred million dollars to the operator of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) due to protests against the controversial project. Specifically, the jury awarded Energy Transfer over $650 million, claiming that Greenpeace engaged in a defamatory campaign to hinder the pipeline’s construction, which traverses sacred lands belonging to Sioux tribes.
The Dakota Access Pipeline
The Dakota Access Pipeline, stretching nearly 1,900 kilometers, connects North Dakota’s oil fields to an Illinois distribution hub. While the pipeline faced delays under President Obama, it was approved by President Trump.
Allegations Against Greenpeace
Energy Transfer accused Greenpeace of orchestrating protests by:
- Hiring outsiders
- Spreading false information about the pipeline
Greenpeace vehemently denies these charges, asserting there is no evidence to support such claims.
Response from Greenpeace
In response to the ruling, Greenpeace plans to appeal, labeling the lawsuit as a threat to First Amendment rights and the future of activist organizations.
Opposition from Sioux Tribes
Both the Standing Rock Sioux and Cheyenne River Sioux tribes have also opposed the pipeline due to environmental concerns, emphasizing:
- Risks to sacred sites
- Drinking water safety
As this legal battle unfolds, it underscores the tension between environmental activism and corporate interests in the energy sector.
Für mehr Informationen lesen Sie auf spiegel
Diskussion darüber post